I've suggested.

.
.
There is great doubt even so.  I probably shouldn't, as you, as usual, even if you choose to, and are capable to, understand you will miss the full picture.  Oh well, I will go for it.

I think what might help is a video I recently found.  No, I was not fooled.  Neo was never the one, as I saw things.  Now, I had never thought deeply enough of it to consider who was, exactly, the one.  Though Smith was on the short list.  By the way, I still don't get why so many consider what the Architect said to be confusing.  I got it the first time and every time since.   Just... I don't know, don't blink.  It's rather simple and straightforward, if he is attempting to appear erudite just for kicks.  Don't buy it and simply listen to him.  Anyway, here.

However, that isn't the full answer.  What you might miss is getting stuck on the movie version and missing the bigger picture.  Imagine if "Mr. Smith" did the unpossible, and hacked flesh... which he actually does do in the last movie.  Now, take that one step further, and beyond the constructs of the digital or flesh, and into the theological.  Take it one step beyond the unpossible and into the unimpossible.  Lets say God called on Mr. Smith, in the flesh, and Mr. Smith answered.

Oh, "Mr. Smith" still has his same job to do.  And he will do it right through you, using you, if required.  Just imagine that he does it, but for God, not against Him.  He would, either way.  It is just that, in the secular and in the movie God is not counted.  If you add Him in, then take another look, you may see how things might otherwise go.  I have discussed almost all of this before, in one form or another.  Unimpossible!  Maybe.  That doesn't confront me none, as long as I get paid next payday.  *wink*  I have already lost, more surrendered.  And yet I still have a job to do.  *ringgggg*  I will help set you free if it kills you.  It already has, and will again, kill me.  The choice is yours as it once was mine.

Later.