.
.
Ribeye. For Christmas Eve. A bigger one. That and a salad. Oh, and I finally tried the crisps, keto crackers, as croutons. Very good, actually. Reminds me more when restaurants would put crackers in with the salads they offered, then true croutons, but... I... enjoyed those, and then. Of course, back then, they cooked with real fats and butters, and were considered unhealthy.
It was a bit much for me, alone. So Sam got some, and I am saving a little piece to reheat and take when I check waterers. It was 35, or so, last time I checked out there. The world is slowly melting. I hear we may get serious snow, though whether here, exactly, or just nearby, I can't say. I don't really get that sense, but that doesn't mean not... it just means I don't sense one way or the other. Actually, if I were to go by my senses, I'd say we won't get much. Difficult to know, though, always. Even when I do feel, it... doesn't work that way... or every time.
I am not sure I enjoy having the heavy meal early. I'm not sure if that is the better way to work this. All I know is, for today, I am trying it. Sam sure enjoyed her portion. I wonder if Sassy will have some? They are strange girls, taste-wise. What one likes, the other doesn't necessarily like. I do like sharing with them, though.
A few beef sticks, and chees slices for what would more pass for lunch, being the middle meal. Then a chia breakfast for supper. Turned around a bit, but all good. I am using a timer in an attempt to not run too late. Perhaps, even, with my heaviest meal down, to attempt to finish eating within four hours, instead of six. I'd really like to punch that timetable, so as to have time for any kind of error, and still be within the six hour window of intermittent fasting... but also to, if I do well, get a bit extra on the fasting front... a few hours a day adds up.
I did review the thoughts from another keto guru. I keep reviewing things. The problem with 150, or a weight loss portion of 141, grams of proteins a day is that I can't find a way to get that much protein down without using protein powders or such. Which... I question. Or, at least, not get that much down and keep fat lower. I can eat ribeyes all day, but that will be a lot of fat. And, lean proteins are... somewhat dubious. Chicken breasts? Not... doable. I suppose, I could remove the skin from chicken? Crisp that for later, as I had been doing. That is... quite nice. But, to keep the fat down, I couldn't eat all of it? Though that might make a really nice crouton type thing for salads, too. And, without dressing, just that crisped and spiced? Maybe.
Still, I haven't figured out a way to get that much protein into my diet. And I really don't like, or trust, powders or bars or such. Anyway... I am continuing to sort these things out. As well? The percentages given don't seem to be matching the calories suggested or the grams by ratio. Ugh. I think someone, most people, suck at math. I'm not great at it, but I know 33% doesn't equate to over half the calories, 4 to 9 ratio or not. Perhaps the opposite, or closer to it. But, not if dealing with calories, only percentage of what is eaten? Trust me, yes, I believe so.
Hmm... let me think out visual... 33% of say fats, carbs, proteins... but by mass? macros? calories? I'm not sure mass works here, or in a way I could conjure. But, macros? Lets say you were eating 100 grams (scale as needed by your dietary guides). That would mean 33 grams would be fat, and a third, but 33. That would equal 33 grams of fat x 9 calories per gram, so... 287 calories. Since carbs and proteins are the same number of calories per gram, and equal 33%, they would each come out to 132 calories. So, total calories would equal 551 calories per equally distributed macros. However, from this side, fats would be 52% of calories. See? Gotta be clear which side of the mark you are using the percentages, because they really don't make sense both ways, to each other. Clarity, people. And accuracy.
My new new plan is... 91.7 grams of fat, 113 grams of protein, and 20 grams (or less) of carbs (allowing for 20 grams of carbs in raw fresh veggies, fruits, or fibers as well). So, actually, 91.7 g-f, 113 g-p, and 20(up to 40) g-c. Ugh, but that variable makes it ugly. Still, min-max? Right? Right. 224.7 grams... but that is useless, it has to be in calories, or it's a + b = ???. So... calories... 1,357 low to 1,437 high calories, and percentages are... 60% f-l, 33% p-l, 6% c-l, to... 57% f-h, 31% p-h, 11% c-h... l being 20 carbs, high being 40 carbs. Ugh. But, if as mentioned, it doesn't work from the calorie side of it. Which is it's own tricky widget.
Well, assuming I use this plan... which... I have decided to do. Then again, I looked at, say, a chicken thigh or drumstick, minus the skin? That is between three and four to one protein to fat. That... is doable... if I could handle that much chicken, without skin. Ugh. I suppose I could go with leaner hamburger, or even ground turkey. Well, with any ground meat, it depends on how lean. At 90%, burger is over 2 to 1, protein to fat. Still... I'll... see how this new new works, as to practical ability. While also working at getting more protein in? Yes, yes, fine.
The thing is, often, the suggestions for this and that don't work as they suggest they will. Remember, as a child, being duped as to how fast Santa would have to fly? To, eventually, either realizing the numbers weren't... possible, even at the speed of light, or perhaps worse, growing up to realize it just ain't so? At least I sorted it out my way. Oh well. Well, I will sort out my diet, since others seem not able to do so.
Finally! I have my mind, app, and menu set up. Well, to a way that actually matches mathematics with application... if user error may be involved. Keep it simple, stupid? Aye, at least... walk until you can run, right? I will work on increasing protein, decreasing fat, while balancing carbs in that nebulous large variability within variabilities. Bleh, double bleh.
I do love this app. It allows me to set things up fairly easily, from goals to % of goals, and a few other things I haven't quite started tinkering with. The only thing it really doesn't do is make sure the percentages, for example, match with the actual numbers... in calories. So... yeah. But... it's not bad.
Numbers, math, on Christmas Eve? Yes. Yes. No time off for good or bad behavior. You are welcome! Later.
So...