.
.
After hearing this term batted back and forth, all this jazz about alphas, betas, and whatnot, and a very little reading (I was not really all that excited about it, just curious), I could not wrap my mind about what was being discussed, so I simply ignored the matter to a degree. And so it has been for some time. Then, recently, it came to me... That is what was used every time I had a dalliance. There is no trick to it, no magic, no... anything. It is what a man uses when he wants to get close to a woman, or quite often, how he tames a shrew. And, to some extent, are they not all shrews? It is part of their game, I suppose. Some play it up front, others play it mid game, some use it as end game strategy, I suppose others are shrewish off and on. I do not really know the strategy of women, it seemed quite irrelevant to my needs, purposes, goals, or the results to be honest.
It does seem as though someone has spent a great deal of time turning what any experienced, half-sharp, typical boy then man will figure out on his own. I have to wonder how pencil-necked the author must be. Even if his strategy works for him, I have to think that it is the only strategy which would. I could be wrong, but I would have to find out better to believe. And, as usual, I would still be somewhat suspicious. Turning the art and aggression of romance into chess just does not cut it. Too much is missing, more so since the stated ends of most of the "gurus" of Game is merely sex.
So, after all this time about wondering what this thing is, I realize, I have known it my whole life. Or, since I was about 5. That is when I "seduced" my first lover. Neither of us new a thing, but I did get it done. If too, I had no clue at the time what 'done' meant, only that I could not bring myself to quit until it was, until years later. Three or four years after that, I began having more regular sex and finally understood. Ah, orgasm.
It was in my early 20's when I decided that Game was not right. Well, perhaps how I was using Game was the thing that was incorrect, if I did not understand that at the time. It seems that we must age, try, fail, and experience in order to grow and learn. Still, at that point, I decided to change my whole approach. I would be kind, I would be attentive, I would... it failed. It failed miserably. No, I still had love(rs). But being a bad dog was the nature of the beast, and I did not know how to undo that. Perhaps at that age with the rearing I had, that was as good as I was capable of doing. Perhaps too, I simply did not understand enough to fundamentally change either my use of Game, definitely not the main other variable (women), nor the circumstances of social disconnect with sexual amoral attitudes and allowances. Even a stint being celibate did not fix the problem. I kept trying, and failing, ending up in my own doghouse of shame in spite of having no difficulty finding, keeping, ditching, or even having multiple love(r)s.
It has only been in the last 10 years that I came to understand a few more things which would allow me to rearrange my life a bit. I realized that the ends I was getting were not the ends I was looking to obtain. However, I realized too that the means, generally, had nothing to do with the outcome. Game, by itself, is the only functional manner in which to find a mate, whether temporary or long term. So, I had to ask, what was my problem. Other variables, of course. Choosing women who could not or would not be viable long term loves or lovers (more or less on that last... digging up bones was an occasional habit back then). As well, having no clear cut idea of what I wanted with a woman (the classic... dog chases car every day for weeks, one day he catches it... then what?). Beyond, I did not know if I even wanted a family.
Time to make some decisions. My last love(r), my current lady friend, was the last of my mistakes. Friend? Sure, give or take, and for my part. I can never trust her with anything significant, there is something fundamentally wrong with her. After her, I became celibate again, and attempt to keep that as close to a vow as I am humanly possible. In this state, I have been considering what I want with a woman, whether I want a family, and how to achieve those things.
Game, as I have suggested, as brutal as it is, is the only method. It creates a hunger in her, it develops some of the natural antagonism needed for a partnership (call it the emotion aus jus of love, romance, and that sort of thing). It also creates a hierarchy in the relationship. It is part of our animal inheritance, I should guess. I have decided I want a woman for more than sex. As fascinating of creatures as they are sexually, there has always seemed more too them, if I have never understood that (and realize I probably never will). Still, I do not have to understand women fully to fully engage them as whole beings. They have so much to offer. Being as often wrong as right, like us, melding the minds to a degree can come up with better options (in certain areas... out of my computer, woman!). A bit more, I do want a family. Children, that is, along with a wife.
Time is growing late. Oh, I could live to twice my current age and more. But do I really want to be a 90 year old father? Or a 70 year old father. Heck, if I start now, I will just push them out of the door before I hit my mid-sixties. Still, I suppose, I do have some time. Now, though, it is time to seriously begin looking. I am not sure how deep or wide the pool of women is here. But I do know I will be looking, using Game, winnowing a good bit, and may well come up with a wife. Children? As with all things, this too is in His hands.
As with many changes planned and being actuated, this is becoming more real every day. This search will take place. A wife, children, as I said, knowing whether or not either will be found or produced is not within my perview. All I can do is go out and beat the street, knock on doors, and try to tame my own shrew. What a change, and yet such little changes compared to what I thought was needed. I suppose, too, even in this and back then, I think God was guiding. If nothing else through the gift of conscience. I bowed to it and Him and here I am, looking for a second master in the form of a mistress. Go figure. It is, indeed, His plan.
Good night, Uncle Bobby. I will say a prayer for the deliverance and rest of your soul tonight.
"It does seem as though someone has spent a great deal of time turning what any experienced, half-sharp, typical boy then man will figure out on his own. I have to wonder how pencil-necked the author must be."
ReplyDeleteSaith the natural alpha. "Any" in this day and age is no more than 20% of the male population.
All I will say is, it's all weird to me. I guess what I was simply doing is considered a trick by most. Or an art? I think this and a few other things are why I have always felt, in part, out of touch. It is simply because I am to 'the herd'. But that is not necessarily a bad thing either. Like anything else, it is how difference is expressed.
ReplyDeleteSo, 20% you say? That is better... no, more common... than my intellectual difference, I think. Still, different makes some interactions more difficult. Good thing I am decent with language and have the capacity to be diplomatic (if I happen to see the need, or want the outcome, ha!).
I suppose though, we all have our weird little schools of various minority status. Again, it is how we tend that. Of course, I am not so sure I would trade what I have either. It's good to be king. Let the peasants howl and raise their pitchforks... I have a boomstick, from S-Mart... buy smart, buy S-Mart. *click click*
Well sure it seems weird to see it laid out all mechanistic-like. It's natural to you. But how do you suppose it seems to those of us who were socialized to deal with the opposite sex in a different (and entirely unproductive) manner? Utterly foreign and unnatural! And yet, the proof is in the pudding.
ReplyDeleteYou may have been damaged by chemical or hormonal means. I was damaged in my socialization in several ways and in several steps that I've been able to identify. Reprogramming is not easy. I've known of the need for this reprogramming for years, since I first began to identify the sources of the faulty programming. But until I started reading certain online sources over the last couple years, I didn't have any idea exactly *what* needed changing and exactly how. And the thing is, the large majority of American men are similarly damaged, since the end of the 1950's and the feminist movement. The Alpha Dogs have been getting their fill all along, but it is only in the last decade or so that the secrets of attraction have been extracted, examined, tested, and systematized to the point that Hapless Betas and Average Frustrated Chumps (AFC's) have a shot at emulating the Alpha's "tricks".
And yea, in some measure it may seem "pencil neck-y" because the early "researchers" were doubtless highly intelligent, successful men in their fields, who nevertheless could not make heads or tails of women. Applying their oversized cerebrums to the task with the level of obsession that is typical of the type, they cracked the code and made it available to the rest of us grateful AFC's in a format that the most Aspergy geek could comprehend. (I'm thinking primarily of Tyler Durden and his type as I write this, as portrayed in Neil Strauss' book "Game".)
If you thought in detail, step-by-step, how you deal with a woman from introductions through to whatever you have in mind, what you expect to occur and why, each step of the way, and wrote it all down, you too could contribute to the body of knowledge known as "Game".
You bad dog you. ;)
Ah, remember the Matrix? The first of the series that is. Remember the Oracle? Remember the bald little boy? There is no woman. The one thing I am sure about, to make it work, is that woman are not included in the equations, calculations, moves, anything. They are merely the object being manipulated, because they do not exist... So, when you suggest I offer advice on how to deal with women, even if I did actually, I don't. Oddly.
ReplyDeleteOf course, that was some years back. Celibacy is because I realize I want there to be a woman, a human in there. For me, it will still be difficult. Teach a mouse hunting cat not to kill and eat? Then again, I think to some degree, as I have said, husbands and wives can only be friends up to a point. They have duties, wants, and needs that contradict one another (rightly and wrongly). As a man, we are to lead and whip a bit, and a bit more than the she. So, what I dream about can never fully exist, if I hope to engage in more than a maid, sex toy, chief cook and bottle cleaner (or more commonly today, an extra income with tits).
I may still be wrong. Hmm, but you do make me think. Should I write what I know and how I went about it? Especially knowing that it will, most likely, end up in the hands of fools who merely wish to follow my empty suit path of the past? I'll think about that. I am still wondering whether to post my 'dreams' or not...
Oh, and I was teasing, a lot, in that comment. The "good to be king." thing was from Duke Nukem and or Army of Darkness, in case you missed it. I just think the whole thing is a bit of a gas.
I've never seen the Matrix. I have requested Daisycat rent it the next time we go on vacation (pretty much the only time we watch movies). I know lots of cultural references from it, but never seen the actual movie.
ReplyDeleteIt was a bit weird watching Caddyshack for the first time a few years ago. Lots of "oh, *that's* where that is from!"
Oh, and making them blush without really trying--yeah, you're a "bad dog" alright. Heh.
ReplyDeleteI trust you'll put your powers to good, when the time comes to woo the right one.
I still struggle to understand some things some times. I was not saying I was a bad dog as a good or cool thing, only that when given a choice between being honest with my past gals, I didn't seem able to do so, at least more early on.
ReplyDeleteAnd, if what I am saying is true at all, again, I do not seem to be using anything. It just happens. Here is a little different. I have a friend from bigger cities back east, who definitely and until he came here, was a player. He gets zip. He is seen more as a threat, so has had to tone things down. His methods don't work here. My non-method only works so far as flirtations, mostly because it is not seen as over-the-top or threatening. I gotta be honest, things for me have changed, so this interaction isn't what it used to be. Oh, and I am not even sure this would end me up in the "sack" with any woman (if I have my suspicions on a few). Married, perhaps, but not in the sack, mostly. And, not trying. Though, here too, I may just not understand? Bah! I never and never really need to understand.
Of course, assuming "used to be" is anything like I think and not some fervid stretch of my imaginings. False braggarts abound and tall fish tales are just that. Still, I think so.
"I do not seem to be using anything. It just happens."
ReplyDeleteRight. Natural. That's why many alphas may say "just be yourself", when asked how they do it. Of course for the AFC, that...falls short.
Athol Kay (marriedmansexlife.com) says that it takes a combination of Alpha and Beta traits for a successful marriage. Which is why players (and many natural Alphas) don't succeed in LTR's, and why many Betas never get a chance in the first place.
So when I read you saying you want a woman, not just a conquest, I hear you saying you want to add necessary Beta traits to your natural Alpha. Whereas game is about adding Alpha traits to a natural Beta.
Yes, okay. I kept getting this sense that being alpha was being put up like a superman and all my instincts were rebelling. Not because I can't find a hump and dump for some period of time, but because I can't find one worth keeping. Crudely as that was put. And, that also makes sense why most of the literature doesn't make sense to me. Beside going the wrong way for me, they are trying to coach guys to do... well, what I thought every guy already did, and some of the coaching is abysmal. Some of it reminds me of locker room advice from the virgin loudmouth. Ha! Usually, the guys who never said a word... Not all of them, but it was in that pool where you would find the one's who were busy.
ReplyDeleteStill, I am not going to dig through advice columns. I will just muddle through what I can of what I can. Add in some prayer, if I find a woman then religious pre-marital counseling, and I don't know. Oddly, the one big burden to ltr is also what makes women so easy. Oh, and knowing how easy women are, it is difficult to trust them.
Still, for guys who have a problem, the "be yourself" line is fine, if not full. Be yourself as if a woman, or a woman you are interested, wasn't there. And if she gets smart, get a little mean. Don't overdo, just put her in her place and continue. If you like romance, make her the target. If you like tech, bring her to it a bit. Women are eminently trainable, and are looking to be trained. They are looking for a leader. Or, here, tailored for you, pretend a woman is a cat. You can't train them completely, they may never obey your will (when you are gone), but they can and do learn your will and like to be near you even when you are doing tech they have no clue about.
That'll be $5 dollar, plus postage and handling... :p