By hook or crook.

.
.
The first story isn't much of a story. Just the facts. Some might suggest this is inevitable in a large group of protesters, others might tend to believe it is just as likely not an end but part of the beginning of such events. I keep hearing how this group is 'just like the Tea Party'. Most msm pounds on the non-existent parallels. One group wanted the government out of our lives, one group wants it to take over banking, Wall Street, major corporations, et. al. One group was made up of working people and families, the other consists mainly of unemployed, perhaps unemployable people who also seem to make a huge mess. One group wanted to be left alone and be allowed to try and make it, the other group wants to be given economically unfeasible government guaranteed wages in government guaranteed jobs. No, nothing comparable at all. Well, though this doesn't sum it up, it does show another major difference.

It is obvious that when a nation begins persecuting all but one religion, that religion, and it's beliefs, quickly become a part of the political, social, legal, and economic landscape, one way or the other. Either economics force the change as the 'aboriginals' die off or economically fail or when the aggressor population rises to a certain level. No skin off my nose, not this one. And since the "common belief" is that the people most often the victims are often the ones voting for the party of the enemy, is seems a fitting thing. Keep voting for security while relinquishing rights, and has been proffered once and a thousand times, you will end up with neither. Whether because of economic or population factors, sharia is coming into play. This is just the beginning.

Oh, and a hint of what is to become of Europe. A prime example of the above. Pretty soon the situation will be irreversible due to population and economic concerns. A story, not a bedtime one, which should cause trepidation in any who have known Europe of old. She is dying. Look at their future, right before it ends.