Considerations.

.

.

Not... claiming these vids as truths?  I will suggest there may be more than meets the eye to them.  If I simply can't fully sign off on them.  Consider it more... poetic psychology?  Transendental philosophy?  You... most likely won't appreciate.  Most who try to go into these won't make it through, consciously.  So understanding is not for most.

If The Architect's speech, in the matrix, required two (or more, many more) listens, to roughly understand, I am not sure you are capable of understanding what these suggest.

Me?  Of course.  Which is why I see certain... problems.  As well, Jung went looking.  My thought is that while he found, to some degree he found what he wanted to find.  He didn't always find the truth.  If, indeed, these are even how he would have phrased things?

If not, whoever did put the clockwork to timber, rhyme, word, seems rather... aware, or worked with various talents to develop something at least verging on the profound... if not, to my mind, absolute.  Though truly world class?  Or merely entertainment?  Plato and Socrates do not inpress me as they do some.  A fanboy, as a lad.  No more.  So... maybe it's me, my problem, for good or ill.

Important enough I don't mind adding here.  Discussing as potentially important.  Orbiting, possibly occassionally defining, truth, or... truths.  At least from my perspectives.

Don't mind, if while listening, you cry just a bit.  More so if you are on the verge of understanding?  Or... if you are hopelessly lost in it.  It's all good.

The truth of dreams?

Final maturation... for some?

Soul rebirth?

Be careful.  If you can do one?  Stop.  Or dare on.  But not without warning.  Some things are not for all to know, or even consider.  Just saying.

Back to sleep?  Maybe, if I can.

-------------

A bit of an afterthought.  I haven't done Jungian practices, or psychology in general.  Finding the clinical practice to be... poor at anything but costing time and money.  However?  If Jung actually did some of the things suggested... personally and his his practice?  What amazes me is that I do some of those things on my own as well.  Interesting.

While I wouldn't have employed him.  If what is suggested is true?  I might have enjoyed a few conversations with him.  Not his students.  They seem lost.  Genius thoughts lost on subpar ritualists?  Though, without that conversation(s), I can't be sure he was anything more than a poet, philosopher, theorist.  Maybe, someday, we will have that talk, or dozen.  If he didn't buy the secular at the cost of his soul's redemption.