.
I keep seeing bits in even the forms of what passes for news even in my materials regarding modern family issues, inflation or whatever that really is, and else. I pretty much ignore these things, because to a degree, they don't have too much to do with me. Still, I thought I would clear some things, like dumping a memory cache, so that I can move on to real issues.
The problem between men and women is pretty simple. The solutions? Those will solve themselves. Currently, those aren't considered as worth pursuing as a social or political problem. The effects of the disconnects, fewer children, a collapsing modernist population, is considered a feature by those with hands on levers.
As things stand, the feminization of women, and modernization of them, means only about five to seven percent of eligible (viable... fertile) women are capable and willing to be a housewife. Willing and able to manage a nest, have children, tend a home and husband, and live that life. That is what men think of when they consider marriage.
Modern women seem to think marriage is about equality, friends with benefits, having one's life paid for, without even solid fidelity assurances, let alone solo sexual access, or simple sex on demand access. Two absolutely and horrifically incompatible understandings of what marriage is even supposed to be, mean. For most.
More, if the (being generous) seven percent of women who do understand, accept, actual marital understandings, and who are capable and willing? Those who would be able to be held accountable to the vows? Not part out of boredom (married life IS boring, dry, lame often)? Say, half of that number is good for the long haul.
On the economic side, men, because of "equality", compete with women in the economy, employment, so aren't able to rightly afford a stay-at-home wife, with children and household. As well, there is the legal and social hurdles. In America, the West generally, law is arrayed against marriage. It is designed to fail, catastrophically.
Men want women. I would love to find a wife, even now. I just realize the legal implications, costs, social issuess. I would require fertility. Oh, yes, even at my age. Which is why women even twenty years younger, and older than that, wouldn't work. Funny that I am still fertile at pushing sixty, while women die to that (what I call their first death) often by their late, even mid, thirties.
No, the powers that be... not just in the West but in China, Russia, pick a country, are pushing food, clothes, lifestyles, and options, to men and women (especially of the fertile sort) which all but ensures few, weak, ill, and problematic children.
The solutions are simple. They simply aren't wanted. I think they believe when populations are collapsed enough, they can just kickstart the whole process. Between contamination through food, clothes, whatever else... and new social norms plus the enmity between man and woman, I'm not convinced that will work.
Will the effects be felt more after I am dead? Or will I live long enough to be (more actively) genocided due to resource collapsing, social untest, or a uninational governmental program. Hitler and Stalin are what tptb want in a leader. Even to war, genocide on many fronts in many ways, and else.
No, not blackpilled. It's plain to see. It's not that it's hidden. Everybody knows, it's just that most people are so entrenched in their fantasy of what could or should be, that they refuse to see the simple truths. Me? Oddly? I still have hope. If hope isn't always a truth, merely a painkiller for the hopeless? I understand the coin, of hope, I toy with in my proverbial hand. It is, as with life itself, a God level thing. I leave it to His will, yet look for opportunity.
Not just sex, not just children, not just this or that. But women are natively on my mind. Troubling, if blessedly. So be it, or... amen to the other fools out there... with some small hopes? *rictus grins*
I'll cover the economy some other time. It isn't what it seems. I promise that much. Later.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Backsass Here