Dream thoughts.

.
.
As I shake the dust of sleep from my eyes, pull the jello flesh more tightly to the bones which act as my support stones, and mull life, thoughts seem to flow so easily. Random thoughts come and go. A few themes develop from time to time in that flow. And as I work through my boot process, these themes are sometimes followed down whatever rabbit holes appear to lead to where I think the white rabbit will be. Some mornings are more entertaining. Some are dark, with foreboding, mystery, darkness, and pain everywhere. There is no necessary rhyme or reason to where or what, they just happen. Sometimes, if waking up is proving difficult, I may go into dream states and almost literally see what my mind is doing, like watching a movie of what my mind is developing. This morning, a couple of the notions, if they did not go all that far, have been playing on the screen. One is about the why of liberalism. The other about feminism, if more lightly treated and reviewed.

I wondered why someone would vote, or support, or propose things that are plainly not true. I wondered why people would devote their whole lives to getting other people to believe in something patently false, baldfaced lies, and detrimental governance. I did split the groups up, as must be done. Some of those, to a greater degree, are merely doing what they were told by those they have given authority on the matters or over their lives. None of these are purely innocent. Yet they are merely pawns. The other group are the people who know precisely what they are doing, they understand why they are doing it. Whether they are more amoral or immoral is another matter, though here too I see no purity regarding immoral or amoral reasoning there.

Those who have surrendered their right to think for themselves often simply accept what they are told by those they consider their betters. Often these are people, oddly, who decry social order and having rules imposed upon them. Or put in a more direct manner, people who do things society does not accept. They may do things that are, beyond that, clearly outside of the law. I am not discussing speeding 5 miles over the limit, or even necessarily smoking pot once or twice a month. I am talking about people who deal in drugs or other black market goods or whose living is dependent upon that, like the girlfriend or wife of a smuggler. Of course, there is not an absolute need to be directly related to either a criminal type, the illicit actions, or the money. Some people simply have friendships, almost exclusively, in those groups. Pedophiles, necrophiliacs, heavy drug users, even heavy porn consumers and drinkers might well fit in this category. There are others, but that sort of gives a gist.

Those who prepare the orders for the above, or the troops as they might be called, are a different matter altogether. These people consciously develop strategies to both give the troops cover, expand "rights" in illicit areas, and produce advertising strategies that are comparable to anything major companies can put out in order to expand the rolls of the troops. These people, from "gay rights" activists to drug lords, work diligently to expand their markets, include more people through direct or indirect involvement, and to engage the political powers both illicitly and through seemingly legal means. Socialism and communism fit here, as they exhibit the same types of behaviors and programs.

I was thinking back to when Vox translated Mussolini's motto. All for the state, nothing but the state, nothing against the state, if I remember correctly. If not that serves quite well as at least a tolerable paraphrase. Now, for the 'generals' of whatever liar group you wish to examine, replace "state" with their group and you about have it. Try, 'All for gays, nothing but gays, nothing against gays.' or 'All for the union, nothing but the union, nothing against the union.', and you will begin to see how these false groups work. They all, often, base their advocacy on populist socialist techniques. This generally works better on the left, for some reason. A group that prides itself on it's independence and free spirit. The irony becomes quite plain quickly.

As for the 'little Indians'? They find their own reasons to follow whichever of these socialist populist 3 step self "help" groups they choose for their own tastes. Old women porn your thing? Well, there is a group for that. Add in unions, academia, and a large serving of welfare, and their is a decent bloc from which to gather support. It is a mix and match thing. If these people are not trying to change the world, they are trying to keep what they kill. There logic, when looked at for just a bit, and thought about at all, is so weak it is mush. Though it is the same with their leaders. The difference is their leaders get the media to repeat things so often that they often pass from the consciousness of doubt. How many here believe that lesbians make devoted, loving, happy couples? Do an FBI statistics check on domestic violence, a general social review on infidelity, and a numbers sniff about drug use in that group. Just look, in other words. And yet... why... you never knew!

As for feminism, I just had a funny bone thought. Well, it did not start out as comic, it just morphed into it with my final moments of thought. It started out considering the problem with parity regardless of sex. I related this to other topics, and then thought, what if we decided all things everywhere must be equal. All appliances, all lighting sources, all electrical devices, all of it, had to run on the same amount of electricity, the same wattage, voltage, and current. This would, to be sure, save on complexity for electric providers, electricians (if many would die), and it would be a ton more efficient. Step down transformers, step down and up converters, inverters, and all other electrical/mechanical thingamabobs are inefficiencies, they lose power in the process. People would die, buildings would burn, and life would become hairy for electricians.

Women were never made to be in parity with men. Biological differences make that impossible. Biochemical reactions make that impossible. Even brain size and function alone, given an equal biochemical stimulus, makes that impossible. And yet, here we are, in a "modern" "scientific" nation firing the head of a elite university for even suggesting the truth. The modernists are no more out of stone-age emotionalism then any pre- or post- modern religion they can point out. Simply it is their emotionalism which has power, a power they are not willing to concede, but not due to logic at all. Oh, the funny thing... About parity... Imagine if feminists had pushed for, and the law had seen fit to stride for and to some degree achieved... weight parity! With some feminists today, sure, but imagine if this was the intent of schools. Stuff feeding girls so they weigh the same as boys of the same height! What a gas! No, I mean it. What a gas!

Pun, as an afterthought, included.

Have a good day.