Immature, rude, crude?

.
.
Well, perhaps.  That could be said, at a minimum, about some of the stuff I link or embed.  Certainly the humor vid, which even I thought was a bit overdone, if I still liked it overall.  The thing is, people like Ozzy, college comedians, and others who might be cast off have done more for men than most will know and more than what even many who do know will admit.  They have kept the naked man and woman from becoming shining artifacts of the past.

While there is a form of feminism that is... not only tolerable, it is admirable, the place for it is in the home, not on the streets, in businesses, and specifically NOT for government.  This form of feminism teaches young people that there is something called propriety, modesty, if it... also doesn't teach the rest, and for a reason.  It teaches men some limits, and keeps us from wearing smelly clothes, or... too smelly of clothes... out the door, or doing other... uhrm... silly man things.  Those things work fine for our purposes, but in mixed company... yeah, well, we are and always will be boys at heart.  A little minder from time to time is... a good thing.  But when even that form of feminism becomes law, it becomes tyrannical, impersonal, evil.  It has been kept in check, by tradition, for all of written history until the early part of the last century, by the facts of life.  The facts of life have been corrupted, technology in other areas has advanced, but feminism in all it's forms is fast approaching full out suicide in order to cleanse the world of itself, and it will take any who attempt to cling to it in a mistaken belief in it, along with it. I hope there is another way, if I am absolutely not seeing any willingness to do so on the part of those who could bring about such changes. 

I am not absolutely sure which part of what I write absolutely pisses people off.  Then again, and as I said before, I honestly don't give a shit.  At this point, I am surprised D.C. is even sticking around.  If it isn't true, or based on the weird understandings of seer-work, then it is false.  I know he is... somewhat socio-legal-professionally indoctrinated.  I see it from time to time.  This makes reading here, at times... difficult, for him, it has to be.  It is against all that "instruction", and he is still bound by that to a degree.  Then again, he is learning Game.  And Game, taken to it's fullness, suggests that much else, besides what he was indoctrinated about concerning women, may also all be a lie.  Maybe he reads here because he is getting a glimmer.  Maybe he is ten yards ahead of me though too, in this understanding, save for my visions perhaps (if I don't always understand those, either... or I don't always want to understand).  It's difficult to communicate more fully through any media where I can't see the face, the eyes, into the soul.  Though, sometimes, even this way, I can, a bit.

Never mind, just... letting you know what's what.  Don't let the naked man and woman become a shining artifact of the past.  Such wondrous things should never be murdered and then stolen away to secret dumping sites, or even completely hidden by lies such as equality, egalitarianism, prudery, or such.  Keep your passion, keep your joy, keep your life and the fullness of it... if, yeah, true, Mom, perhaps a little more privacy about it, at some points, might be a bit wiser.  If you must, call that post a... celebration of the straight, a caricature of the blessed union of man and woman, pushing the line.  Just remember who you are.  That is what it was about.