.
.
I am trying to wrap my mind around that. Pageviews, is what the number is about. Now, I don't mean to chase people off, but I don't write so as to keep them, either. I am not writing for pageviews. I merely try to get some notions set out to be reviewed, explored, or simply to be rid of them. Oh, I know, 56,000 isn't that many, compared to what some get. Vox probably gets many more than that in a day. I suppose there are even some who, over the course of time involved, get fewer. Neither is the point, and it wasn't a goal. It just surprises me. That is, assuming I can trust the number. Which, to be absolutely honest, I cannot. Up for some reason, down for other reasons, it is definitely wrong. Still, it is what I have to go by, like a clock that is off, odometer that is on the fritz, or social input. In any case, it was one at a time.
I have just over 5,000 posts. That means, in theory because while one number is sure, the other is very off (doesn't always count foreigners, or even some US commenters, for example), there have been about 11 views per post. Who knows how many legitimate readers went unaccounted, and how many of those visits were by spambots. As mentioned, I have these numbers, and nothing else, so... Then again, this was over eight and an half years. Not exactly a whirlwind pace. Just numbers. Insignificant. But... mine, sort of.
Hmm... on to something to eat. Later.
Sammuel,
ReplyDeleteWas it Sammuel? You don't understand. Not only do I not wish to promote your site, I do not wish mine to be promoted. Those who find, and enjoy, for as long as they may, will do so. Most aren't ready.
Go find someone who wants to be king or queen of the internet nihilism, self-seeking centrism, or such. I want no part of any of it. I merely write to clear my head of darkness, arrange priorities, and thank God. Things most moderns cannot tolerate. Go beg shared spotlights with those who are self-satisfied in their damnation.
-----------------------------------
ReplyDelete